these extensions are described in section 4. · RFC A Message Summary and Message Waiting Indication Event Package . Find the most up-to-date version of IETF – RFC at Engineering Find the most up-to-date version of RFC at Engineering
|Published (Last):||9 April 2008|
|PDF File Size:||4.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Other for any supplementary information:. By using the user agent capabilities extension,  user agents terminals can describe rfcc when they register so that others can search for them according to their caller preferences extension headers.
ITU-T A.5 reference justification
This mechanism is necessary since SIP can run not only over reliable transport protocols TCP that assure that the message is delivered, but also over unreliable ones UDP that offer no delivery guarantees, and it is even possible that both kinds of protocols are present in different parts of the transport network. This way, the registrar is able to discover and record the sequence of proxies that must be transited to get back to the user agent.
This kind of extensions are called option tagsbut SIP can also be extended with new methods. The security mechanisms agreement extension for SIP  was then introduced to provide a secure mechanism for negotiating the security algorithms and parameters to be used by the P-CSCF and the terminal.
The state publication framework defines a new method: Each kind of event a subscriber can subscribe to is defined in a new event package.
It is then, when all the resources for the call are in place, when the caller is alerted. There are several mechanisms to achieve this, such as:.
Ief include an efficient use of the radio interface by minimizing the exchange of signaling messages between the mobile terminal and the network, a minimum session setup time by performing tasks prior to session establishment instead of during session rfcc, a minimum support required in the terminal, the support for roaming and non-roaming scenarios with terminal mobility management supported by the access network, not SIPand support for IPv6 addressing.
Retrieved November 29, Other useful information describing the “Quality” of the document: Accept-Contact to describe the desired destination user agents, Reject-Contact to state the user agents to avoid, and Request-Disposition to specify how the request should be handled by servers in the network i.
Request for Comments RFC documents encompass new research, innovations and methodologies applicable to Internet technologies. SIP is an exceptionally popular and extensible rfd. The degree of stability or maturity of the document:.
IP multimedia concepts and services 2 ed. Therefore, a mechanism is needed in order to route requests to the desired device or application. When a proxy server receives rrfc request from an untrusted entity and authenticates the user i. Likewise, if the server does not support any of the client’s required extensions, it will send an error response with a list of its unsupported extensions. Other requirements involve protocol extensions, such as SIP header fields to exchange user or server information, and SIP methods to support new network functionality: Ietff the IMS every user agent is served by its P-CSCF, which is discovered by using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol or an equivalent mechanism when the user enters the IMS network, and all requests and responses from or to the user iett must traverse this proxy.
In the IMS framework it is fundamental to handle user identities for authentication, authorization and accounting purposes. Visit Store Sales Request.
SIP extensions for the IP Multimedia Subsystem
Support Overview Unrivaled technology surpassed only by our service. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process. The event notification framework 32665 how a user agent can subscribe to events about the state of a resource, but it does not specify how ietg state can be published.
Retrieved December 3, This way the recipient of the message can decide whether or rrfc to follow the reference to fetch the resource, depending on the bandwidth available. However, as many words are repeated in different messages, the extended operations for SigComp  define a way to use a shared dictionary among subsequent messages.
Information on RFC » RFC Editor
The functionality of sending instant messages to provide a service similar to text messaging is defined in the instant messaging extension. Partners Overview Collaborating to set new industry standards.
Retrieved November 15, In SIP, the route header field, filled by the sender, supports this functionality by listing a set of proxies the message will visit. The main functionality is supported by the P-Asserted-Identity extension header. These header fields are used for a variety of purposes including charging and information about the networks a call traverses:.
With the caller preferences extension,  the calling party is able to indicate the kind of user agent they want to reach e. The aim of event notification is to obtain the status of a given resource e. In the IMS, the initial session parameter negotiation can be done by using the provisional responses and session description updating extensions, along with SDP in the body of the messages.
Retrieved 3 December Entity Capabilities XEP RFCs,,,,Errata Exist 7.